Voici TOUTES les Solutions IA à VENDRE aux Entreprises en 2026

Voici TOUTES les Solutions IA à VENDRE aux Entreprises en 2026

Here Are ALL the AI Solutions to SELL to Businesses in 2026

Title history
  • Voici TOUTES les Solutions IA à VENDRE aux Entreprises en 2026 — observed on 20261101-2336 UTC (YouTube)
🎙 Simon De Lima 👥 23K 📅 October 4, 2026 ⏱ 20 min 👁 15K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-11-01
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

AISMEbusiness consultingproductization2026 trends

Summary

The video presents a comprehensive map of AI intervention points within a typical service-based company, organized into seven poles: leadership, marketing, acquisition, sales, production, HR, finance, and legal. The creator emphasizes that in 2026, the focus has shifted from fragile task automation to building custom, integrated tools for businesses, using platforms like Cloud Code. He claims that a non-developer can construct tailored solutions in days, selling them for thousands of euros plus monthly subscriptions. The content includes real examples with pricing: an email assistant sold for 3000€ setup plus 290€/mo, a quotation system for 13500€ setup plus 440€/mo, and a workshop management tool for 4789€ plus 89€/mo. The strategy advocated is to sell vertically—one pole or module at a time—and to build a reusable data foundation for incremental expansions. The video is largely a promotional pitch for the creator’s coaching program (‘collectif’) and Instagram giveaway of a detailed map. While offering a practical, structured overview, it lacks scientific rigor, verifiable evidence, and objective analysis.

164 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in its systematic mapping of business pain points where AI can be applied, offering a useful checklist for entrepreneurs. The argumentation is anecdotal, relying on claimed personal successes and testimonials rather than empirical data. The creator does not provide evidence for the effectiveness of the solutions or the accuracy of the pricing examples. The reasoning is logical in explaining why SMEs need AI and how a seller can approach them, but it is heavily biased toward promoting his own services and coaching program.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video cites no external scientific sources or studies. The only references are to the creator’s Instagram and a wolph.ai link to his collective. The title is accurate but sensational, promising ‘all’ solutions, which is an overstatement. The content is consistent with the title in scope, but the lack of verifiable data and the prominent self-promotion undermine its scientific and informational credibility. No comments are available for analysis.

172 words

Title / Content Match

The title promises a comprehensive list of AI solutions to sell to businesses, and the video indeed delivers a structured map of seven business domains with numerous intervention points, though the depth of each solution is limited.

Quality & Reliability

4/10

The video is essentially a promotional pitch for the creator's coaching program, lacking verifiable data, critical analysis, or external sources. While it offers a structured overview of potential AI applications, claims about revenue and success are unsubstantiated. The information is anecdotal and heavily biased.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video provides a structured and practical framework for identifying AI opportunities in small businesses, which is useful for entrepreneurs. Its main contribution is the systematic mapping of seven business functions and many sub-points, combined with real pricing examples to illustrate market value. However, the content is not original scientifically and serves primarily as a marketing tool.

Pour aller plus loin :

96 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high breadth of information but low depth and reliability. The video covers many topics but lacks technical detail and scientific grounding. Its strength is the quantity of structured ideas, while its weakness is the lack of verifiable data and objective analysis.

Reliability 3/10