Stella Spadoni | Proof bounds and decidability in computability logic

Stella Spadoni | Proof bounds and decidability in computability logic

🎙 Stella Spadoni 👥 8K 📅 October 22, 2026 ⏱ 17 min 👁 2 📄 original study 🧭 2026-10-22
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

computability logicproof boundsdecidabilityCL5CL15circuit calculus

Summary

Stella Spadoni, a PhD student at IMT Lucca, presents her work on proof bounds and decidability in computability logic. She introduces computability logic as a constructive game-semantic framework introduced by Japaridze in 2003, where formulas represent games between a machine and an environment. Key notions include computability, wability, and validity. She explains the language’s operators: negation, blind/choice quantifiers, parallel, sequential, toggling, and branching operators. The talk focuses on two fragments: CL5 (negation and parallel operators) and CL15 (adding branching operators), both based on circuit calculus. For CL5 without duplication, she proves the existence of polynomial-size proofs using a direct syntactic analysis of proof construction, analyzing width, length, and node size. For CL15, she addresses decidability by bounding contraction applications, showing that at most one contraction per branch preserves provability, and provides an always-terminating decision procedure. The talk concludes with applications to automated verification of security protocols and an automated theorem prover for CL15. The presentation includes technical details on circuit representations and proof search algorithms.

165 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides significant value by offering a fresh approach to proof complexity in computability logic. Instead of normalizing existing proofs (as in Berwanger’s work), the author analyzes the bottom-up proof construction, exploiting structural and geometric constraints to obtain explicit bounds. The argumentation is logical and well-structured: for CL5, she breaks down proof size into width, length, and node size, demonstrating that each parameter is polynomially bounded in the absence of duplication. For CL15, the proposal to bound contraction applications to one per branch is justified via an equivalence result between the bounded and unbounded systems, established by induction on circuit complexity. The reasoning is sound, though the presentation is dense and assumes prior familiarity with the framework. The potential applications to security protocol verification and concurrent theorem proving are compelling, but remain preliminary.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is high: the work addresses open problems listed on Japaridze’s website, and the methods rely on formal proof systems and structural analysis. The speaker cites Falappa’s work on CL5 (likely Berwanger) and mentions the list of open problems, but does not provide detailed references beyond the talk itself. The title accurately matches the content, focusing on proof bounds and decidability. The presentation includes technical appendix material with algorithms, though the video quality is not assessed. The venue (Isaac Newton Institute) is reputable. No external sources are explicitly cited beyond the event page, but the talk is part of a workshop on logical foundations of complexity theory, implying relevance to that community.

263 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: the speaker discusses proof bounds and decidability results for specific fragments of computability logic.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The talk presents original research on proof complexity and decidability within computability logic, delivered at a prestigious institute (INI). The technical depth is high and the reasoning appears rigorous, though the audience is specialized and the results are not yet peer-reviewed publicly.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk presents two novel contributions: a direct proof of polynomial-size proofs in CL5 without duplication, using a syntactic bottom-up analysis that yields explicit bounds on proof width, length, and node size; and a decidability proof for CL15 by showing that contraction can be bounded to at most one application per branch without loss of provability. This offers a new structural perspective compared to previous normalization-based approaches. The work also suggests practical applications in automated verification and proof search.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Computability logic — Overview of the framework, relevant for understanding the context.
  • Giorgi Japaridze — The founder of computability logic, with links to his original papers.
  • Proof complexity — Field addressing the size of proofs, directly related to the CL5 result.
  • Decision problem — Fundamental concept for decidability, relevant to CL15 result.

136 words

Radar Profile

The profile shows a high level of technical depth and information quality, with moderate accessibility. The talk is dense but well-argued, scoring high on rigor and originality, while the audience is specialized.

Reliability 8/10