Дискуссия про «Дальнее чтение» (10 лет спустя)

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information is high: the discussion includes first-hand accounts from a translator of the book, offering unique insights into the translation process and reception. The speakers present a balanced view, acknowledging both the success of the book’s distribution and the limited development of a coherent school of thought in Russia. The argumentation is solid and grounded in specific examples, such as the book’s sales, its presence in bibliographies, and the absence of a clear methodological legacy. The debate about the term ‘distant reading’ and its possible alternatives (e.g., ‘mediated reading’) demonstrates critical engagement with the concept. The discussion is well-structured and collectively builds a comprehensive picture of the book’s trajectory in the Russian context.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is good: the participants are recognized experts in digital humanities, and they ground their claims in personal experience and observed trends. The sources mentioned include the book itself, its preface, and various academic and public engagement channels. The title adequately reflects the content: it is a discussion about ‘Distant Reading’ ten years later, exactly what the video delivers. The level of analysis is sophisticated, and the speakers avoid exaggerations, providing a thoughtful and critical retrospective. The quality of sources is mainly based on personal expertise and published works, though the discussion does not cite external studies explicitly. The video fulfills its promise as a scholarly discussion.

The title accurately reflects the content: a discussion of Moretti's 'Distant Reading' ten years after its Russian translation.

7/10

The discussion brings together three experts in digital humanities, providing informed perspectives on the reception of Moretti's work in Russia. The presentation is rigorous and reflective.

Markers derived by PSI from the transcript: the creator did not define chapters.

• 02:00Introduction of the 50th seminar and the topic of the discussion.
• 05:00Alexey Vdovin recounts the history of the translation project, starting in 2014.
• 10:00Discussion of how the title 'distant reading' was chosen, with alternative options considered.
• 20:00Boris Orekhov analyzes the concept of distant reading as 'mediated reading' and its triadic structure.
• 33:20Debate about the actual impact of Moretti's ideas in Russian literary studies.
• 50:00Forecast of the future of distant reading in the age of large language models.

• DHRI Telegram channel — Channel for news about the Institute of Digital Humanities Research.
• Kulturny datasience Telegram channel — Channel by Daniil Skorinkin on cultural data science.
• Demontazh Krasnorechiya Telegram channel — Channel by Boris Orekhov on digital humanities and rhetoric.
• DHRI VK page — VK page of the Institute of Digital Humanities Research.